From e-mail:
Could you maybe add a post saying something along the lines of--"I talked to Ben Callard, and while his situation is clearly very serious indeed, he doesn't have a prognosis yet, so (to paraphrase Mark Twain) reports of his imminent death have been exaggerated."
Yes. Yes I could. I talked to Ben Callard, and while his situation is clearly very serious indeed, he doesn't have a prognosis yet, so (to paraphrase Mark Twain) reports of his imminent death have been exaggerated.
No doctor has said anything like "terminally ill", "inoperable", or "not long to live" (if any such thing is to be said, God forbid, it would be said at the prognosis, which is apparently due this friday). Professor Callard also says it's probably a a thyroma or a lymphoma, not lung cancer.
(I know I heard in the MAPH office that it was lung cancer, because someone doubted that Professor Callard "had ever had a cigarette in his life". The consensus in the room was that he did indeed seem like the sort of guy who has never had a cigarette.)
So, everything except "pretty bad cancer" was erroneous. I apologize for the errors.
The Callard children remain cute. I stand by that part. (And the rainbow-colored backpack/sling/wrap thing that the younger kid gets carried around in is adorable. Though it's the most impractical-looking thing I've ever seen; I have no idea how the kid gets in or out. Maybe it just looks complicated, and it's actually held together by velcro or something.) And the class was starting to get good; I'd heard a lot of uncertainties expressed about the course after the first class or two, but everyone seemed to like last monday's class. (And the post-doc that's currently teaching the class decided to skip to Frege, so I'm sitting in on it for at least a while longer*.)
But it's good to know I was wrong about the worst of the details.
*I'm really not sure whether this or Non-Deductive Inference is the course I should be registered for; I suppose being registered for NDI forces me to get out the door earlier on tuesdays & thursdays, which is good because the buses run more often then. It would feel weird to not show up for the analytic class, though. It felt weird to not show up to the Darwin class today, and I was mainly sitting in on that to see how many classes I could stand to sit through -- and I only missed it today because I had a doctor's appointment!
Posts
7 comments:
Get a bike. It's a much faster way to get around Hyde Park (and the rest of Chicago, even) than the bus.
Never learned to ride one, so it'd be of limited usefulness.
Ah those poor U of Chi. Poloniuses. Get well soon!
Doesn't Leiter do his bidness up there now? "Doc" Leiter, teaching Nietzsche as "methodological naturalist". Hah. Nietzsche may have certain shortcomings, but methodological naturalist he was not: "unmethodological naturalism" better describes Nietzsche's thought (recall that bon mot about "the will to a system as decadence... etetc....).
However much college boys might protest, Nietzsche's heroic subjectivity's closer to say the writing of Jack London than to a Kant or Hume (Darwin, or say, Hume's aboout methodology, one most filosophes no longer bother with....) .
Yr mission? Take Leiter out, s-Dan.
He's in the law school, not the philosophy department. Certain unnamed parties were emphatic about this point when I brought it up at orientation.
May I inquire, do you have an update as to the current health/status of Professor Callard?
I've heard treatment is going pretty well. He's teaching two courses this quarter (neither of which I'm taking), so presumably he's doing at least that well.
Post a Comment